Independent polymer-science opinion on why a plastic part failed, and whether the material, the design or the process was responsible.
Start with a conflict check. Send the party names and the technical subject matter only. Do not send case details, documents, samples or privileged material before an engagement agreement is in place.
Polymer science and engineering is the core discipline of this practice: it is the subject of the principal’s doctorate, of his professorship at The University of Southern Mississippi, and of the larger part of his refereed publications. The material classes covered include engineering plastics, polyolefins, polyamides, polyesters and polycarbonates, styrenics, polyurethanes and thermosets.
The full record, including awards and appointments, is set out on the credentials page.
Conflicts are cleared first. After an engagement agreement is in place, the evidence is reviewed, any testing is commissioned through independent university and industry laboratories, and the opinion is reported to counsel before it is written up. The scope of expert work, and answers to the questions counsel usually ask first, are on the Expert Witness & Litigation Support page.
A short conversation is usually enough to tell whether independent technical review is worth it — and if it is not, you will be told so.
Describe what is happening, what it is costing and what decision is waiting on it. You will get a direct assessment of whether and how this can be investigated.
Discuss Your ChallengeSend the parties and the technical subject matter only — no case details, no documents. Conflicts are cleared before any substantive discussion takes place.
Request a Conflict Check