Technical analysis for infringement, invalidity and prior-art questions in polymers, composites and related materials.
Start with a conflict check. Send the party names and the technical subject matter only. Do not send case details, documents, samples or privileged material before an engagement agreement is in place.
Where the product under evaluation cannot be assessed with standard equipment, custom test equipment can be acquired or built to suit it. That is often what produces the measurement an infringement question depends on.
The principal is a named inventor on seven patents and the author of more than 150 refereed publications, so he reads claims and prior art from both sides: as someone who has written them and as someone whose own work has been examined against them. Four decades of teaching also bear directly on explaining polymer chemistry to a court without distorting it.
The full record, including awards and appointments, is set out on the credentials page.
Conflicts are cleared first. After an engagement agreement is in place, the evidence is reviewed, any testing is commissioned through independent university and industry laboratories, and the opinion is reported to counsel before it is written up. The scope of expert work, and answers to the questions counsel usually ask first, are on the Expert Witness & Litigation Support page.
A short conversation is usually enough to tell whether independent technical review is worth it — and if it is not, you will be told so.
Describe what is happening, what it is costing and what decision is waiting on it. You will get a direct assessment of whether and how this can be investigated.
Discuss Your ChallengeSend the parties and the technical subject matter only — no case details, no documents. Conflicts are cleared before any substantive discussion takes place.
Request a Conflict Check