Independent opinion on failures of fibre-reinforced and hybrid materials, where the interface and the process matter as much as the constituents.
Start with a conflict check. Send the party names and the technical subject matter only. Do not send case details, documents, samples or privileged material before an engagement agreement is in place.
Nanocomposites and organic–inorganic hybrid materials are a direct research specialism of the principal, alongside carbon and aramid fibre composites, FRP and GRP. Fibre–matrix debonding, delamination and interface failure are the mechanisms most composite disputes turn on, and they are the ones a jury most needs explained plainly.
The full record, including awards and appointments, is set out on the credentials page.
Conflicts are cleared first. After an engagement agreement is in place, the evidence is reviewed, any testing is commissioned through independent university and industry laboratories, and the opinion is reported to counsel before it is written up. The scope of expert work, and answers to the questions counsel usually ask first, are on the Expert Witness & Litigation Support page.
A short conversation is usually enough to tell whether independent technical review is worth it — and if it is not, you will be told so.
Describe what is happening, what it is costing and what decision is waiting on it. You will get a direct assessment of whether and how this can be investigated.
Discuss Your ChallengeSend the parties and the technical subject matter only — no case details, no documents. Conflicts are cleared before any substantive discussion takes place.
Request a Conflict Check